Site logo

F1 reveals its blueprint for the future


Much like Brexit, it seems that we have been talking about the planned overhaul of the sport post-2020 for ever, yet without anything actually happening, far less agreed upon.

Furthermore, like Brexit, there is currently an October deadline, by which time all must be agreed.

F's Managing Director of Motorsports, Ross Brawn, Chief Technical Officer, Pat Symonds and the FIA's Head of Single Seater Technical Matters, Nicholas Tombazis, have given details of their blueprint for the sport's future.

The mission to take the sport forward involves four main factors, cars that are more 'raceable', a more level playing field, exciting looking cars and the sport's finances.

While the aero changes this year have clearly had some impact, but not enough, Tombazis claims that the changes from 2021 will have a significant impact, with a possible return to ground effects, the controversial aero aid first introduced to F! in the 70s by Lotus and which were subsequently banned in the mid-80s due to safety concerns over the high cornering speeds.

"The first part of the objective is to improve the wake from the front car so the rear car doesn’t suffer so much performance loss,” says Tombazis. "As an indication, when a current car is two car distances behind, it may lose almost half of its downforce, and that makes it much more difficult to follow closely and creates a situation where you destroy the tires much more easily.

"What the following car receives is much cleaner flow," he continues. "Typically we are going from about 50 percent loss of downforce for the following car at two car distances down to about 5-10 percent loss. So we have a massive reduction of the downforce deficit) for the following car."

Along with the loss of down force, the sport is moving from 13 inch wheels to 18 inch and compounds that will hopefully see a reduction in the dreaded tyre management.

"We are in fairly deep consultation with Pirelli about how to make the tyres really step up and be in a position where they enable people to race," he continues, "they don't degrade, they don't force people to manage the tyres so much."

"We were asking completely the wrong things of Pirelli over the last two years," says Symonds. "High degradation target is not the way to go."

In a bid to make the drivers jobs that little bit harder - something they've called for in recent months, it is proposed that tyre blankets be scrapped.

Almost from the moment Liberty Media bought the sport, Chase Carey and his team have outlined the need to level the playing field, creating a sport where everyone has a chance of a podium, possibly a win, as opposed to the current system where there are effectively three 'championship' within the one, mostly dictated by money.

"We have three teams that can win races at the moment, that's all," says Brawn. "Over the next couple of years, Formula 1 will be on a much better path… where a really good, moderately-funded team, can cause a lot of trouble.

"That's what we want. If you get a Charles Leclerc or a Max Verstappen in a midfield team, it can make a difference. It won't matter at the moment."

Poacher turned gamekeeper Brawn knows exactly how one team can suddenly find an advantage over its rivals, as a result the new "very prescriptive" aero rules are aimed at preventing this happening.

"From the relative freedom teams have had so far, it's going to be frustrating," he admits. "But if they can take the approach that these regulations are the same for everyone and 'we're going to do a better job than anyone else, we just won't be two seconds faster, we'll be two-tenths faster', that's what we want from Formula 1."

Further ideas being looked into include a reduction in car-to-pit telemetry, and the removal of some driver aids. The sport is also looking to have the trackside engineers play a lesser role during races and placing more emphasis, and responsibility, on the driver.

The sport is also seeking to give the look of the cars an overhaul, seeking a faster-looking, more aggressive look for the sport post-2020.

"We do aim for the final product to be aesthetically pleasing," admits Tombazis. "To be a car that promotes a certain amount of passion and a certain 'wow factor', so we want that to be part of the new Formula 1.

"The front wing, we're still not completely pleased about," he adds, the sport still seeking some refinements ahead of the October deadline, "both from an aerodynamic point of view and from an aesthetic point of view.

"We're trying to make it a bit better in both aspects," he continues. "There's good reasons why the wing is very wide aerodynamically, but we all will appreciate that it's not the best aesthetic result, so there's work going on there."

As well as working with an "automotive stylist" in order that significant design features can make their way into the regulations, F1 and the FIA are looking at the circuits, something that Lewis Hamilton referred to following Sunday's British Grand Prix when he admitted that some current (and future) tracks are not conducive to good racing.

Then, of course, there's the all-important financial aspect, which means teams getting a more equal share of the prize pot, the introduction of a budget cap and the scrapping of some of the bonuse agreed under the 'old management'.

In a further bid to curb spending the sport is seeking to introduce standardised wheel rims, brake systems, radiators and pit equipment, as well as a ban on hydraulic suspension systems, a restriction on the use of certain exotic materials and a freeze on the specification of gearbox parameters.

In addition, while Jean Todt's desire to see refuelling introduced doesn't appear to have much support, the sport is looking to reduce the amount of time teams can spend in the windtunnel and to limit the amount of personnel employed.

"The great teams will still be the great teams," says Brawn. "But in all the marginal gains that they do where they have ten people on a project instead of two, which brings 5% more performance, they won't do that anymore.

"They can't, or if they do, they'll be losing out in other areas where perhaps they could perhaps be making better gains," he adds.

"Currently what is happening in Formula 1 is that there's work to 'break the rules'," says Tombazis. "One thing that has lacked in previous attempts by the FIA with new regulations is the opportunity to really try to push them to the extreme, and see ourselves if in certain areas, are there loopholes or certain unintended consequences that may emerge from the rules.

"So my colleagues at Formula 1 in the aero department have now put a hat on which is a bit different. It not a rule maker," he insists, "but it's like an aerodynamicist in a team trying to see how much they can stretch the rules."

"Our objective is to make Formula 1 more entertaining, more accessible, more sustainable," concludes Brawn, "sustainable from a commercial perspective, not just an environmental perspective. And this is the first time in the history of Formula 1, certainly in my period, that there's been such a deep study of what's needed. I think we can do an awful lot better job than we're doing now and we're tackling that on every front.

"But I would stress, this is not a one-stop-shop," he admits. "This is not a set of solutions, we put them in place, we walk away and we see how it goes. We're going to put ourselves in a better place, and then we're going to carry on tuning and developing to achieve what we believe Formula 1 needs.

"We've arrived where we are today without an awful lot of structure," he says. "My view is that (Formula 1 is in) the wrong position, for lots of reasons, and this is the first step in putting it into a much better place."


more news >



galleries >

  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images


or Register for a Pitpass ID to have your say

Please note that all posts are reactively moderated and must adhere to the site's posting rules and etiquette.

Post your comment



1. Posted by Superbird70, 21/07/2019 13:36

"I saw your poll on refueling. Yes, as long that is the only service that is done. Separate tire stops."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by Spindoctor, 19/07/2019 10:23

"The old paradox of trying to be the 'zenith' of motorsport, but also a good 'show'.
If you really, really want close racing, then you limit Teams' options, maybe have a single Chassis, as in some series. The fewer options for innovation, the less chance there is of domination, and its 'cheap'.
Traditionally F1 has aspired (in theory at least) to being a place for innovation or at least frantic development. As much Brains as Brawn[sic]. Someone nearly always gets a jump on the rest, and their domination lasts in inverse proportion to the amount of in-season testing permitted by the rules. Constant minor rule changes tend to exacerbate this. At present we are seeing how with relative stability of PU development, other factors are coming in to play.

These proposals seem clearly to be 'Show'-related. Aerodynamically cars will evolve (given a bit of time) to exploit the same characteristics, and look and perform quite similarly. PU's will continue to be developed for maximum reliability at the expense of performance and innovation. I expect there will be more 'racing', but I'm unconvinced that this will help the poorer teams."

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by Egalitarian, 19/07/2019 4:08

"I'm not sure about 13" to 18" wheels. I like a bit of sidewall and it can also be useful for bump absorption.
I agree with the barge board comment. I have no issue with the shape of the wings, but a tad narrower would be nice, however limited to no more than three horizontal elements on the front or rear. The side element should be one flat plane or curve - no additional blisters/bumps/zits.
No rear sails anymore is a good thing.
And this will upset a few, but aesthetically, that halo is an abomination. (No need to make comment on that - I already know what most will be)
The low-degradation tyre thing is interesting. Perhaps remove the mandatory pit stop rule? That would remove, or at least reduce, some of the artifice within the race.
This is F1. There is already a championship for endurance. So for me, two engines per race would be good. Gearboxes completely free with options to alter ratios throughout the weekend. That might keep the engineer/driver relationship really symbiotic.

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

4. Posted by Lapps, 18/07/2019 8:43

"One aspect I am VERY happy about is the death of barge boards. These have to have been the worst looking aspect of F1 design since the ‘wings on sticks’.
Just hope the intakes of the ground effect system are restricted to a reasonable (small) size.

I agree with ...99 that a set of rules should be issued and then left alone. Anything else plays into the hands of the big boys."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

5. Posted by imejl99, 18/07/2019 6:53

"I commented on twitter acount @pitpassdotcom
Ferrari almost there, RBR almost there, McLaren next year will be. Just in time to start over. 1 will get it right from scratch, 3-5 y of dominance. Just leave it as is, it would level.

I have to add, the richest will benefit most with rule change as they have most resources.

And Brawn`s statement "this is not a one-stop-shop... we're going to carry on tuning and developing to achieve what we believe Formula 1 needs" should for most of the teams with limited resources be scarier than anything, even scarier than split-second high voltage car refueling."

Rating: Positive (3)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

6. Posted by elsiebc, 18/07/2019 6:09

"You can see it a mile away but they refuse to look. There was a time that the field was more spread out and yet there were many upsets and unexpected wins. It was because each team could determine their own ratio of performance to reliability. If they couldn't win in a straight up and up fight they picked a different fight and sometimes it paid off. Now they all have to fight the same and the FIA wonder why the pecking order won't change. Also, with refueling you could choose how light (fast) to run your car and it gave different strategies to make up for other deficits. Make everybody do the same and then scratch your head when one team dominates. As for money, in 2003 William's budget was nearly $250 million. And that is in 2003 dollars! Now they can't even raise half of that. Maybe F1 needs to spend more time creating advertiser value and less time figuring out how to hamstring the ones putting on the show. And when they tell them you can only spend x amount, what do you think is going to happen when one team gets the new format right? The other teams won't be allowed the resources to close the gap. If you think the Mercedes domination is bad, you ain't seen nothing yet. "

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

7. Posted by TokyoAussie, 18/07/2019 3:37

"Here's hoping."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Share this page


Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2024. All rights reserved.

about us  |  advertise  |  contact  |  privacy & security  |  rss  |  terms