Site logo

Mercedes ends controversial Kingspan partnership

NEWS STORY
08/12/2021

Following a public outcry, Mercedes has announced that it and Kingspan have mutually agreed to end their partnership.

Announced just a week ago, the new partnership, said to be worth £4m a year, included Kingspan chairing a new Sustainability Working Group for the team, and aimed to deliver carbon reductions through their leading-edge environmentally sustainable solutions for the team's future campus.

However, following a public outcry, both parties have subsequently concluded that it is not appropriate for the partnership to move forward at the current point in time, notwithstanding its intended positive impact, and have therefore agreed that it will be discontinued with immediate effect.

In its own statement, Kingspan said:

Sustainability and sport are two long-standing passions and commitments at Kingspan. When Mercedes AMG Petronas F1 Team approached us to chair their new Sustainability Working Group, we saw a unique opportunity to bring the two together in a way that would support a sport we love, while bringing sustainability to a world stage.

We are deeply aware of the sensitivities raised in recent days, and so we have jointly agreed that it’s not appropriate to move forward at the current point in time.

Much has been written about this over the past few days, and out of consideration for our customers and all the great people who work for us, we believe we must respond.

We had no role in the Grenfell Tower refurbishment. However, our Kingspan Insulation UK business is a core participant in the Grenfell Tower Inquiry and fully supports the Inquiry’s important work.

We understand that this is a complex topic, but there are some important facts that we would like to explain:

1. We did not make the exterior cladding on Grenfell Tower. The Inquiry itself has stated that "the principal reason" for rapid fire spread on Grenfell was the polyethylene cored ACM cladding used on the exterior of the building. No facade system using this PE ACM cladding, regardless of the insulation used, would have passed the necessary large-scale system fire test. Our K15 insulation board was misused in this unsafe and non-compliant system.

2. We did not supply or recommend K15 to Grenfell Tower. K15 made up approximately 5% of the insulation layer of the façade system. It was substituted without our knowledge.

3. We have completed new tests which support the previous fire safety claims of the three historical K15 large-scale system tests which came into question during the Inquiry process.

We condemn in the strongest possible terms the wholly unacceptable historical conduct and emails which emerged throughout the course of the Inquiry discovery process. We have sincerely apologised for these actions by a small group of employees at our Kingspan Insulation UK business. This in no way reflects Kingspan’s culture or values.

LATEST NEWS

more news >

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images

POST A COMMENT

or Register for a Pitpass ID to have your say

Please note that all posts are reactively moderated and must adhere to the site's posting rules and etiquette.

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

 

1. Posted by kenji, 09/12/2021 11:03

"Mercedes have bowed to the media pressure and dumped on a firm which by all accounts can not be held responsible for doing anything wrong. The firm did not supply the material [5% ] and were totally unaware of it's use in the Grenfell Tower. So much for the famed British sense of justice and innocent until proved guilty."

Rating: Positive (2)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by Spindoctor, 08/12/2021 15:57

"@Mad Matt - I understand your point & "Innocent until proven otherwise" is nominally how UK System works. The problem is that UK Media have revealed a lot of what appears to be very dodgy practices all round. Kingspan is central to the inquiry and keeps coming up. Just or not, their Brand is currently toxic in UK.

Certainly, UK Governments are hugely responsible for allowing poor standards and for failing to enforce even those. Hopefully they'll help everyone affected...."

Rating: Negative (-4)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by Mad Matt, 08/12/2021 13:25

"Seems a shame that a firm which appears to have no responsibility for the fire gets targeted like this. It seemed to me the UK government stepping in was more about shifting blame than doing anything helpful."

Rating: Positive (11)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Share this page

X

Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2022. All rights reserved.

about us  |  advertise  |  contact  |  privacy & security  |  rss  |  terms