Site logo

Renault unconvinced by engine formula

NEWS STORY
08/01/2016

When the planned introduction of the new engine formula began to falter, mainly due to Bernie Ecclestone's fears that it was the wrong way to go, it was Renault that spearheaded the drive to press ahead with the plan, threatening to walk away from the sport (groan) unless F1 went turbo hybrid.

Ignoring the fact that the new formula has proven prohibitively expensive, and has gone down like a damp squib with most fans and drivers, there is also the little matter that Renault, in particular, has produced an absolute clunker.

No real surprise therefore, to hear managing director Cyril Abiteboul admit that the new engine formula has failed.

"Hybrid regulations are important, not just to Renault but to any car maker," said the Frenchman, according to Motorsport.com. "If you look at the future product line of most brands, you will see hybrid elements on all cars.

"If you ask me about this particular set of regulations, how important they are, we should not be precious," he admitted. "I am not completely convinced that we have the engine regulations that are completely fit for purpose for the model of modern F1. For the show, for the cost for the manufacturer, for price for the team, also noise and serviceability and so on and so forth.

"Also there is all the sporting elements associated with it, like the token system, which is extremely confusing, and the penalty system, which is extremely confusing. I don't think we have something brilliant.

"Having said that, do we need to write this off completely or improve what needs to be improved and fix what needs to be fixed rather than trying to come up with something completely new? I'm not quite sure.

"The problem is when we try to come up with something completely new, which is trying to be a breakthrough in comparison to what we had before, it is not necessarily brilliant. The regular thing is evolution rather than radical changes. It is very difficult to anticipate what will be the effect of radical change. But we are completely open to change in the regulations."

Something to bear in mind whilst the geniuses that came up with this 'unfit fit for purpose' show ponder the next raft of rule changes.

LATEST NEWS

more news >

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images

POST A COMMENT

or Register for a Pitpass ID to have your say

Please note that all posts are reactively moderated and must adhere to the site's posting rules and etiquette.

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

 

1. Posted by gturner38, 10/01/2016 16:37

"The way I'm reading that is that they think the rules might not be quite right but they don't want it completely thrown out. They just want some adjustments because a complete overhaul is hard to get right."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by sumpnz, 10/01/2016 9:03

"The problem is less to do with the hybrid-turbo formula than the near complete inability to develop the cars throughout the season. In a pointless attempt to curtail costs in season engine development was banned. But all that accomplished was to lock everyone in at the current level of performance. Merc way out in front, Ferrari best of the rest with Renault at best middling in power and Honda abysmal. If development (and therefore also track testing) were allowed then it would also be a race to see if Ferrari could take the fight to Merc, and give Renault and Honda a fighting chance to do ... something."

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by scf1fan, 08/01/2016 16:44

"Unconvinced about their suitability . . . for what purpose??? Given, they are more expensive, and complicated . . . but per any other (equitable) criteria they are faster! (Hadn't he ever heard the adage "Speed costs money! How fast do you want to go?")"

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

4. Posted by testa rossa, 08/01/2016 16:16

"
- sigh -"

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

5. Posted by ClarkwasGod, 08/01/2016 15:07

"Karma's a real bitch isn't it M. Abiteboul?"

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

6. Posted by cathalobrien, 08/01/2016 13:54

"This drives me mad when I hear Renault say this when as you said, was something Renault wanted in the first place. Just because they cant seem to get it right, they want to change the rules."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Share this page

X

Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2024. All rights reserved.

about us  |  advertise  |  contact  |  privacy & security  |  rss  |  terms