Site logo

Why F1's Reluctance To Accept Andretti & Cadillac Is Only A Bad Thing


Here we go again.

You may remember last year, legendary American team Andretti Autosport announced their intention to enter Formula One in the near future. 'Great', the majority of us thought - at long last, there was finally the prospect of a brand new team entering the sport, providing another two cars on the grid from one of America's premier racing outfits.

However, frustratingly, the reaction from the paddock at the time was rather different - and distinctly lukewarm. You may also remember that I wrote a piece about this. Toto Wolff, boss of Mercedes, claimed that Andretti had to prove its 'value' before it was ever accepted onto the grid, whilst Stefano Domenicali - F1's CEO - went on the record as saying that he believed that the existing 10 teams were enough, and anyone else who wished to enter the sport had to be somebody 'really significant'.

The underlying message was clear enough - 'we're not interested in lowly independent teams, go away and find a manufacturer, then we might be more accommodating.'

And you know what? To Andretti's full credit, they have.

When Andretti made their announcement of a partnership with Cadillac (and parent company General Motors), with the goal of racing in F1, there was a palpable sense of surprise. Despite being one of the largest car companies in the world, GM have previously shown very little interest in entering Formula One up to now.

But, it just shows the leaps and bounds in popularity the sport has made in recent years - particularly Stateside - in addition to the new cost cap regulations, which are opening up the possibility of partnerships that would have been unthinkable only a few years ago. This new era is proving to be of interest to manufacturers that you wouldn't expect - and that should surely only be a sign of the positive direction F1 is heading in.

And so, that should be that. One of the most successful racing teams in America, with all the necessary technological and financial capabilities for entering F1, now securing backing from one of the biggest manufacturers. Their entry into the sport should be a mere formality, right? Fans can look forward to seeing an 11th team on the F1 grid sometime in the next few seasons, correct?

Oh, if only things were that simple. But sadly, they never are in F1.

Despite the announcement, it seems that the attitude from the majority of existing teams (with the notable exception of McLaren and Alpine, who have previously been in support) is that the Cadillac announcement changes nothing, and the grid should continue to remain fixed at the current ten teams.

The main objection to expanding the grid rather predictably stems from the issue of money. Existing teams do not wish to see the current prize money divided into 11, rather than ten, as is the case now. Some analysis estimates the amount of money teams stand to lose should a new team enter is around $5m per season for teams at the back of the grid, or $10m for the likes of Red Bull, Mercedes and Ferrari.

That sounds a lot - but in F1 terms, this is chickenfeed - particularly when you consider how they would be recompensed. When the most recent Concorde Agreement was signed in 2021, it included a clause that any new entrant must pay an 'anti-dilution' fee of $200m - with existing teams therefore receiving a one-off payment of $20m each. However, teams no longer feel that this is a significant enough figure.

With the value of an F1 team currently estimated to be around $1b, existing teams instead wish to see the anti-dilution fee increase to around $500-$600m. Such eye-watering sums of money just to enter the sport will surely dissuade even the few manufacturers who can afford it - and likely mean the grid never expands beyond the current ten.

Of course, it is understandable that the teams wish to look out for their own financial interests. But it just acts as a reminder - if one was ever needed - at just how much F1 is in danger of losing its soul. Perhaps it has sold it already.

As a lifelong fan of more than 25 years, I find this whole discussion so thoroughly frustrating. Take away the financial arguments, and the addition of Andretti and Cadillac to the grid would clearly only be a net positive. As already mentioned, the immediate benefits are obvious - a further two cars on the grid, opening up another two seats for talented drivers, and providing more job opportunities for aspiring F1 engineers to break into the sport. I want to see new teams enter, rather than just be stuck with the current crop forevermore - rebrands of existing teams, as we've seen in recent years, come nowhere close to the excitement generated by an entirely brand new outfit.

20 cars should be the bare minimum a World Championship such as Formula One has. In races of attrition, it becomes noticeable just how low that number really is. Domenicali argued last year that the current ten teams are all financially healthy. That's as maybe, but should a team disappear tomorrow, it would immediately plunge F1 into near-crisis in regard to grid size. More worryingly, it would likely raise the ugly prospect of three car teams again, which would only benefit the big three of Red Bull, Mercedes and Ferrari. That is why more should be being done now to bolster the grid, should the worst ever happen - after all, we've seen enough turmoil on the global financial markets lately.

It's bad enough that F1 had turned its nose up at Andretti until it secured the backing of a manufacturer. Not only is it highly risky for any series to rely on the whims of manufacturers, it flies in the face of the sport's long history.

Legendary names like Brabham, Tyrrell, Ligier, Arrows, Minardi, Jordan and so many others have propped the grid up, and kept F1 healthy, during times when big budget manufacturers have departed - often at short notice. Gate-keeping the sport from independent teams is not only wrong, it's almost as if the lessons from the fall out to the '08 financial crisis - when Honda, Toyota and BMW all withdrew in short order, and Renault severely cut back its involvement - have been completely forgotten.

Inevitably, there are some who question the value of new teams, based on those that have come before. After all, they haven't exactly been successful.

HRT scored a grand total of zero points across three seasons before the team disappeared. So too did Caterham. And it was only because of the late Jules Bianchi at Monaco in 2014 that Marussia avoided a similar fate, before they too eventually vanished from the grid. More recently, Haas - still F1's newest team, despite entering in 2016 - has been regularly found to prop up the rear of the grid far more frequently than they appear towards the sharp end.

But there are some necessary caveats here. It's important to remember that HRT, Caterham and Marussia were originally assured a budget cap would be introduced when they first entered F1 in 2010. When it failed to happen, it essentially doomed them from the start. Whereas in the case of Haas, they actually started off as a reasonably competitive team, before they eventually slid back down the order in recent years.

But comparisons to these four teams are arguably no longer relevant in this new budget cap era of F1. Whilst Andretti and Cadillac's competitiveness cannot be guaranteed, these rules certainly make it more likely that new entrants won't just be consigned to the back rows of the grid for many years. Let's not forget this is Andretti - a team with significant history and success in many different motorsport categories. The level of disrespect and arrogance shown towards them from the F1 paddock is quite frankly breath-taking. They're not just a no-hoper that's just been set up by a bored billionaire that wants a new exciting way to waste their money.

But their prospects of being allowed to race in F1 still hang in the balance.

Whilst existing teams don't have any direct power to prevent new entrants (as well they shouldn't) - they can still use their sizeable influence to get what they want. Additionally, they have a strong ally in Formula One Management (FOM) - who will likely side with them to see that their interests are protected.

However, current FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem tweeted his support of Andretti, stating that the sport should be "encouraging prospective F1 entries from global manufacturers and thoroughbred racers".

The battle lines between FOM and the teams and the FIA have therefore been drawn. The political wrangling is likely to go on for some time to come - and official confirmation of the acceptance of Andretti's F1 entry (if it is indeed granted) is unlikely to happen in the short-term.

As fans, we can only hope that common sense eventually prevails and that we do indeed see an eleventh… maybe even a twelfth team lining up on the grid in the near future. However, if Andretti's entry is refused, it will be a huge mistake that sets a deeply worrying precedent for the future of the championship.

Personally, if that happens, I for one will seriously consider turning my back on this great sport for good - because never will it be more evident that F1 is no longer for racers, but has instead just become a money-making business for greedy, self-serving parasites.

James Singleton



more features >


galleries >

  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images


or Register for a Pitpass ID to have your say

Please note that all posts are reactively moderated and must adhere to the site's posting rules and etiquette.

Post your comment



1. Posted by BrightonCorgi, 16/06/2023 19:32

"If not letting in Andretti backed by GM is FOM's true colors; it's a shitty ass color."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by geordiemik, 28/04/2023 19:06

"Isn't it funny that the teams refuse to share out their money to another team, but nobody seemed to complain when more and more races appeared on the calendar adding their pots of gold to the prize fund? Extra TV money will have been generated from media companies in the new countries but that never gets a mention.
I began to lose interest in F1 some time ago when it became obvious that money was the driving force along with some very strange ideas about increasing the 'entertainment' aspect of what used to be a sport. I can still remember a time when F1 could generate interest without deliberately producing self destructing tyres or opening rear wings. In fact I thought that moving aerodynamic components were illegal. "

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by didaho, 29/03/2023 12:36

"I don't know what planet some of you jokers are on but it's the oil companies and engine manufacturers that are pushing for 'green' fuels in order to stretch their hegemony out as long as possible."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

4. Posted by intrepid, 20/03/2023 17:33

"a "lifelong fan of more than 25 years"? When I was a first-year student at Columbia Law School I was subscribing to "The Autocar" weekly magazine that arrived New York City three or four at a time as the crossed the Big Pond in the holds of RMS Queen Mary (the first) and RMS Queen Elizabeth (likewise). Lawrence Pomeroy was writing. Somewhere I still have the issues reporting the 1955 24 Heures du Mans so horribly punctuated by Pierre Levegh's crash in a Mercedes 300SLR. The first Formula 1 race I attended was the British G.P. at Silverstone in 1960; Aston Martin ran two front-engined DB single seaters - Roy Salvadori and Maurice Trintignant driving.

On subject, I could not agree with you more strongly since in my garage(s) with the Ferrari 412 and 575M Maranello are a 2006 Cadillac STS-V (a splendid supercar - hand-built supercharged four-cam V8 - and a Cadillac CTS daily driver."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

5. Posted by frankguzauskas, 11/03/2023 16:11

"I totally agree with Mr Singleton. I also think the big 3 are scared of Andretti/Cadillac. To have 3 F1 races in the U.S. and not have an Andretti team allowed to participate is a huge insult."

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

6. Posted by kenji, 01/02/2023 14:39

"@Max....Yes, I agree however these distractions/side shows will vanish a few days before the lights go out for '23. The summer break is far too long and the days and weeks drag. This year there are so many changes that it should be different and hopefully more exciting than I've seen for quite some time. I'm just wondering where Lost Capito and his sidekick will emerge....that and the Ford/GM and Andretti hoo har plus the latest rumour of AM selling while the price is high? Wow, all that and some racing as well."

Rating: Positive (2)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

7. Posted by Max Noble, 01/02/2023 8:33

"@Kenji - we will have to get Esteemed Editor Balfe to add Wine appreciation to the growing list of “Side Shows” here at PitPass! :-) Agree Aussie reds are far heavier than their European cousins…

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

8. Posted by kenji, 01/02/2023 2:49

"@ Max...have had Grange on only two occasions and to be quite candid I felt that it was certainly well overpriced despite being paid for on my expenses! My tastes in 'red', apart from Ferrari , tend towards the softer and smoother tones like those of the Gironde. Aussie 'reds' are usually big and are very popular especially if that's mostly what you've been familiar with for a long period. Whites are a totally different realm......early Petaluma's were world class."

Rating: Positive (2)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

9. Posted by Max Noble, 31/01/2023 10:56

"@Kenji - so true! But then home with a Grange also costs a fortune these days…! :-)"

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

10. Posted by kenji, 30/01/2023 10:44

"@Max Home, home on the Grange.
where the deer and the whatever roam etc etc etc.

For the average cost, according to Motor Sport, of an F1 gearbox you could have a brand new Ferrai and $100,000.00 in your sky! At cost, possibly two brand new Ferraris. These costs are
/were out of control. Never sell yourself short Max hahaha"

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

11. Posted by Max Noble, 29/01/2023 8:23

"@Kenji! Down the rabbit hole we go with Alice! If we become totally utilitarian then no sport, or art should be conducted… Yet we humans are a funny bunch… Ballet? Blues? Mozart Great Mass? Red Hot Chili Peppers? Lawn Bowls? EPL? LIV Golf…? Most of life actually makes no sense… How “green” any of that non-sense is not usually an issue. Stand back and unless it is food, shelter, or medicine, it adds “nothing” of utility to life…

F1 is wallet racing just as open ocean yacht racing is, or the pursuit of Olympic Gold medals… I cannot help but love the madness that is F1, and heck, it costs money, regardless of how green it may, or may not, be…

…I drive a car, have an air conditioned house, and use commercial aircraft… Best thing for the planet is to lock me up… :-) …and if you want to send me 1Kg of Gold I’ll write a really nice article of your choice, as I’m “cheap” too…! :-)

Rating: Positive (2)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

12. Posted by kenji, 28/01/2023 11:31

"Thanks to all that seem to be in agreement that Todt and his team have wrought insane damage to F1 by forcing the 'green' elements. Christian Sylt, writing in Forbes Finance back in 2018 indicated that Mercedes Engine Co. had spent/invested upwards of US$1.4 billion in getting this 'green PU' up and running successfully. These ridiculous amounts need to be accounted for by way of recovery either by achieving a very high RFI or else offset by returns in a like for like...TV exposure, and ultimate public sales success is but one way of justification.

There have, over the years, been many intelligent engineers who claim that there were far more economical alternatives but it was the woke Todt regime who wanted to pose large on the green world stage.
To lighten the debate consider this. A F1 steering wheel weighs between 1.1 & 1.3 kg and costs somewhere in the vicinity of US$ $55/60K. One KG of pure gold costs approx US$60K/63K. "

Rating: Positive (3)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

13. Posted by ancient70!, 28/01/2023 9:35

"@kenji well said, don't get me started on these green pu’s, I-actually took the trouble to check how many of Mercedes cars are actually powered by a 1600 single turbo v6, and the answer is? 1, the F1 cars."

Rating: Positive (4)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

14. Posted by ancient70!, 28/01/2023 8:55

"Well said! I fully agree with your sentiments. Having followed F1 since the early sixties, I still stand to be enlightened as to how many times big car manufacturers have had a positive impact on F1? I can only think of 2! And I am talking about F1, not sport scars, different ball game altogether. "

Rating: Positive (3)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

15. Posted by Chester, 27/01/2023 16:50

"@Kenji. Truer words have never been spoken. That green agenda was and is costly. And high costs leads to the need for high revenue.
Wow. Thank you, sir."

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Share this page


Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2024. All rights reserved.

about us  |  advertise  |  contact  |  privacy & security  |  rss  |  terms