Site logo

The Colour of Monet

FEATURE BY MAX NOBLE
04/11/2022

Claude Monet (1840 to 1926) is often viewed as the father of Impressionism. A truly beautiful art movement, style, concept, call it as you must, that like the romantics in music, when Beethoven dared to compose with passion about what he felt, chase concepts seen more with the soul than the senses.

Throughout his life Monet pushed the establishment of the time, before folding into a highly observed personal world which gifted us mere humans his "Water Lilies" series.

250 oil paintings over thirty years of the same scene, as far as Miss Physics was concerned, when it came to geo-reference points. Yet when it came to Claude's sight becoming increasingly impaired by cataracts each painting was altered not only by time of year, time of day and ambient light, but also by his failing visual sensors. His physical self could see less, so his soul had to see more.

Much as I admire - and follow as I can - the works of Adrian Newey, James Allison or, in the past, Gordon Murray, it is the spirit dance on the edge of death performed by the drivers which captures my heart, fires my soul, and excites me on race day. Sure, we can see, and measure, and compare lap times, yet it is those moments when the driver transcends the simulated, predicted performance of the car and produces a lap which has the team breathless while delighting us all, regardless of grid position initially secured or finishing place obtained.

So Red Bull, as detailed in reporting on this site, have transgressed the cost cap by a few handfuls of change, yet the other teams are still howling for several more pounds of flesh. Should we expect less from them in this post-truth age, where he who howls loudest and longest can claim bizarre social media victories?

Look at the reported facts, do not listen to those howling in the wind...

The Pitpass news article "Red Bull fined $7m for cost cap breach" captures the accounting drama in concise detail. A touch over 5.6 million pounds inaccurately reported, leading to, by the FIA's initial estimation 1.8m pounds, being a 1.6% overrun in over-spend.

Please dear reader, perform the flip with me... that means 98.4% of the Red Bull submission was spot-on... Think on that. 98.4% perfectly fine... when was the last time you got any task 98.4% correct, as verified by external judges dear reader?

The arch-bean counters at the FIA then broke-out the flux capacitor enabled abacus, and further corrected the Red Bull numbers, with a smug statement that if Red Bull had treated UK tax rules correctly, the actual overspend was about the same amount as the options list on a McLaren road car. To wit, 432,652 pounds Sterling, which at the time of typing equates to the cost of a takeout coffee over $376,000 US dollars. Or 0.37% over the cost cap...

So, flip with me again, we are now at 99.63% perfect compliance. What in your life is guaranteed within 0.4%? Any of you with a Swiss mechanical watch on your wrist will be misplacing more than 0.4% of the time of day every few hours as you speed recklessly about your imprecise life. Does it destroy you?

So I believe the fine can be judged as fair. It is far and above the cost overrun, and the 10% hammering of wind tunnel time is also a massive impairment for such a modest offence. Even when one has the Super-powered Adrian Newey on the books that is a big hit to testing and evaluation, and hence development activities.

Dear reader, for the tiny, and unintended error this was, Red Bull have been taken around the back of the bike sheds and given a sound beating with the old willow cricket bat. This will leave bruises that will hurt all through next year.

Will it let Haas win a Grand Prix next season? Will it enable Lewis to claim a stunning eighth title? Will it give us race winners across all the teams next season? I believe not.

Will it reduce the amount V. Max wins by next season? Possibly, we will never have the sliding-door chance to know by running an alternate reality next to the 2023 season.

Yet the cost cap was never designed to improve the racing. No dear reader, this is sleight of hand by the FIA and Liberty Media. The cost cap is all about making an F1 team franchise a money printing machine.

Consider the Miami Dolphins NFL team, they of Carpark GP, fake marina and painted waters fame... oh, and American Football.

The Miami Dolphins are owned by Stephen Ross, who happened to be fined $1.5m last year for "tampering" with Quarterback Tom Brady while he was employed by the Buccaneers. The Dolphins have a 2022 valuation of $4.6bn. Yup, just one NFL team, and the franchise is worth 4.6 billion US dollars!

Back in 2009, Ross paid $1.1bn for the team. Since then it has generated massive annual revenue, with the figure being around $533m in 2022, leading to an operating profit around $160m. With a notional capital gain of $3.5bn plus half a billion a year in revenue it would appear to be a touch more profitable than the average lawn mowing, or pool cleaning franchise.

Let us now compare Stephen's $1.5m fine for clear cut cheating to these big numbers. It is a modest 0.03% of the franchise worth, or a fractionally larger 0.28% of revenue. Or a huge 0.94% of operating profit!

2020 figures claim the average Australian full-time wage was $89,122 Australian dollars. Being around $55,700 US dollars, or roughly 49,900 GB pounds. Let's multiply that by 0.03%... Which yields a figure of $16.70 US dollars, or 14.97 GBP. Ummm.

Red Bull has been fined $7m US, plus the 10% wind tunnel reduction. From a cost capped budget of $145m US for the 2021 season. That's a whopping 4.83%! If Steve and his Miami (Vice) Dolphins had been fined at that level he would - based on the team's valuation - have been asked to handover $222,180,000 US! Being an impressive 148 times larger than the fine he actually paid. Ouch.

Or, compare the hit on our own road-going hip pockets. Based off the Australian average wage, a 4.83% fine would amount to $2,690 US dollars! So which is more likely to get you to slow down to a government approved (if pointless and annoying) posted speed limit? $16.70 US, the Miami (Vice) fine, or $2,690 US, the FIA fine? The cost of two coffees and a small biscuit, or the cost of an old functional second-hand car?

The FIA fine, plus testing restriction was fair and reasonable for the size of the error. As the FIA, and others, have noted; it was not cheating, it was an error of rule interpretation.

Now, back to the colour of Monet.

Liberty Media want to provide an entertainment product such that F1 franchises move toward that NFL model whereby each franchise is a Goose laying Golden Eggs faster than their Scrooge McDuck owners could ever spend them.

In 2020, Stephen Ross was worth - according to Forbes - around $7.6 billion US dollars. Which only placed the poor lamb 185th on their rich list. No wonder he is seeking additional income from F1. Divide that $7.6B by the average Aussie annual wage, and you get the number 136,445.

That is, it will take the average Australian 136,445 years, being approximately 1,772 average lifetimes, to earn as much as Stephen is worth. So if my ancestors in the middle Palaeolithic or the Eemian era roughly 136,000 years ago, had bothered to open a savings account and get the ball rolling I might by now, as an average human, have amassed the same wealth as Stephen.

So never, dearly devoted reader assume anything planned, enacted or delighted-in by the hyper-wealthy had anything at its core other than mighty self-interest. They are seeing with their visual receptors, not the soul of Monet.

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST FEATURES

more features >

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images

POST A COMMENT

or Register for a Pitpass ID to have your say

Please note that all posts are reactively moderated and must adhere to the site's posting rules and etiquette.

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

 

1. Posted by Max Noble, 04/12/2022 4:16

"…ah the dirty fork! If only we had also covered the dirty knife… The Fine Folk of Python World were so, so far ahead of us all…"

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by Spindoctor, 10/11/2022 11:12

"Your strictures are hugely validated by Wolf's comments about the relative merits of Audi vs Andretti.

"..We have ten franchises that we hope can increase the value and you are certainly not going to increase the value by issuing new franchises to people who cannot increase the overall value of Formula 1," he insisted..."

I believe the phrase is Nuff Said!

More generally the whole cost-cap nonsense continues unabated..."

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by Chester, 06/11/2022 11:50

"Nail on the head, Max. An Occam's Razor explanation that the cap exists to improve team owner profit rather than improving Haas' and William's chances of success.

Makes total sense. I hope it also improves the show. It works in American football. "

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

4. Posted by ancient70!, 06/11/2022 7:06

"Another good one Max! As to the crime and punishment debate, I still do not have any idea what is a effective punishment for a unintended minor overspend. The one thing that puzzles me is what is the $7m fine supposed to achieve? It is not going to rattle RB’s financial foundations, but it would be a disaster for Hass? I wonder if you just deduct the overspend from next years budget cap would be more effective and fair. Oh and while I am on that subject, I suppose RB can now add the fine to next years budget cap, and claim it as expenses?"

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

5. Posted by Superbird70, 05/11/2022 12:09

"Interesting observation. This model works much better for F1 than most other sports. In other sports (football, hockey, baseball, etc.) the franchise is rooted a city or community. The local fans demand a winning product or they tend not to put bums in the seats. Teams can relocate or fold as a threat for improved venues. No such issues for F1, plenty of willing sites for racing and the fans are globally distributed with no local team to cheer for."

Rating: Positive (2)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

6. Posted by Max Noble, 05/11/2022 1:28

"@Bill Hopgood - ah the good old “We hate Ron” fine! As you note, compounded when a crime against Ron goes unpunished… and the Ferrari engine issue of 2019… Total transparency in all cases…! As I enjoy noting… no human institution can match the 100% consistency record of beloved Miss Physics… Every atom, *every* time, exactly in place…"

Rating: Positive (2)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

7. Posted by Bill Hopgood, 04/11/2022 22:01

"Thanks for the article.
You've put the Red Bull situation into perspective.
While reading this I was reminded of when McLaren Mercedes "spy gate" scandal back in 2007 where they were fined $100M USD for having one rouge designer getting his hands on Ferrari's then current car design.
From memory, this information didn't permeate through McLaren and they could not use the design or anything that was "leaked" from Ferrari to the McLaren test driver, and his fellow Spaniard driving for McLaren at the time, as McLaren and Ferrari had such different philosophies.
That same year, a former staffer left McLaren with multiple design documents and went to another team, no fine was issued.
Does the punishment fit the crime?
Not back in 2007/8 and not in 2021/22, and we still don't know what the heck happened between the FIA and Ferrari back in 2019. Perhaps Netflix could do a documentary on that... I don't think that's going to happen somehow.
Thanks again for the article."

Rating: Positive (5)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Share this page

X

Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2023. All rights reserved.

about us  |  advertise  |  contact  |  privacy & security  |  rss  |  terms