Site logo

A Time For Vision


The BRDC has said that it cannot guarantee being able to hold the British GP beyond 2019, the earliest it can trigger an escape clause from its contract. This is ironical given that most F1 teams are within easy reach of Silverstone and that the British GP has one of the highest attendances of any F1 race.

Ironical, yes, but no more ironical than the fact that Germany, which also attracts huge crowds, cannot afford a race on ticket receipts alone.

Singapore has indicated that it will terminate its contract. Its agenda was to use the race to boost tourism and now that has been achieved the country no longer needs the expense of a Grand Prix. In this Singapore is copying manufacturers who have entered and left F1 as it has suited overall company strategies.

A fundamental problem is that having a Grand Prix allows a country the prestige of hosting a major sports event. You could organise a tennis tournament and if you offered a big enough prize fund, you would attract star players, but your tournament would be seen as a bit of bling and it would not be one of the four that matter. Host a Grand Prix and you are part of a World Championship and Formula One does have high television viewing figures.

I think that this is PR bullshit and what it does do in some cases is to give the few who control the money an ego massage. They are vanity events, without substance. There must be few indeed who have had a sudden desire to visit, say, Abu Dhabi, Azerbaijan or Bahrain just because they hold a race, These countries have no tradition of motor sport. They have no grass roots and often they even have to import marshals.

There is a body of opinion that says that the British government should subsidise the Grand Prix not least because the motor racing industry employs around 40,000 people and has an annual turnover of more than a billion pounds. Money from the National Lottery has been distributed to many sports resulting in Team GB's impressive performance in the last two Olympics.

Then there is the money the government gives to the Arts Council for distribution, but that does not embrace, say, a West End musical which is purely a commercial enterprise.

With these precedents in mind, I can see a case for the government or the National Lottery giving a grant to Silverstone, or any other circuit, for improvements as an amenity which serves a thriving industry. To make a grant to a single race would be like supporting a revival of 'Phantom of the Opera'.

A Grand Prix is a commercial enterprise and the right to grant permission to hold one has recently been bought by Liberty Media. Before the rights to Formula One were sold by the FIA, the organising club benefited from any profit and bore any loss. From 1987, Silverstone has held the British GP - how that came about is another story - and the BRDC has been the organising club.

Since the BRDC is a not for profit organisation Silverstone was able to subsidise grass roots club racing, usually on a Saturday with only a handful of spectators. These days the BRDC is in financial crisis and much, not all, of the reason has been that the cost of hosting the Grand Prix increases year on year at a rate considerably higher than inflation.

The first F1 Grand Prix at Silverstone was in 1948 and the circuit hosted the first race of the inaugural World Championship two years later. It has come a long way from the days when the circuit was marked out by straw bales and race control was a second-hand double decker bus.

There have been mistakes, like spending more than 14 million pounds on the 'Wing', when it was not asked for by Bernie. There have also been allegations of mismanagement by full-time employees, some of whom were escorted from the site. More than anything, however, has been the cost of the Grand Prix.

Germany can no longer afford to run one. There have been question marks over Montreal, Monza and Spa while France, which invented Grand Prix racing, is to host its first since Felipe Massa won at Magny Cours in 2008. Singapore has indicated it is not to renew its contract and Malaysia is likely to follow.

Shanghai keeps going because of the oriental notion of losing face, though after the first couple of races, schoolkids were bussed in to fill grandstands. India, South Korea and Turkey built special circuits to host races.

Liberty Media has made all sorts of positive noises, but has yet to make a single hard proposal. A spokesman has said that every race should be like the Superbowl but, being American, he seems not to know that the Superbowl is a local event of little interest elsewhere unless something goes wrong during the interval entertainment.

Liberty Media claims that it wants more Grands Prix in the USA and few could find fault with that. America has several thriving motor racing traditions and it is also the show biz capital of the world, it would be a positive move. A problem may lie with the contracts that the vanity races have signed. It is not only the legal issue, but the fact that they are also cash cows and Liberty needs to show a profit.

CVC, the previous owner of the rights had no interest in motor racing and returned not a penny to it. They were not concerned with history or tradition, though every other sport is. As long as someone was prepared to pay for a vanity race, they could have one and the FIA was compliant.

It will take time, but Liberty Media needs to shed the vanity races and make it possible for Formula One to take place in countries with an interest in motor racing, like Argentina and the Netherlands. Oh, and Germany.

From every leak from Liberty Media, one forms a picture of a company which believes it can make a commercial success of its acquisition, but which also wishes to nurture it. America may be short on ancient history - not a henge to be had - but it is long on sporting history and celebration. From 'Gentlemen, start your engines' at Indianapolis to the various Halls of Fame, Yankee and Johnny Reb alike appreciate tradition.

Some countries have a tradition of motor racing, others have vanity events. It is thriving tradition which breeds marshals without whom no event can take place.

Liberty Media has suggested a cap on expenditure which has been vigorously disputed by Ferrari. Ferrari already receives a bigger chunk of revenue than any other team because, so the myth goes, Formula One would be unthinkable without them. This is PR bullshit, no team is bigger than the sport, not even Arsenal.

Performance in F1 is partly determined by cash so paying Ferrari more is like giving a team in any other sport a bonus of a few points with which to start a season. It is unfair and downright wrong.

Enzo Ferrari used to get his own way by threatening to withdraw and, on one occasion in the 1950s, threatening to enter a monastery. Ferrari has needed motor racing to sell its road cars which have often been poorly engineered. Time was when Ferrari was, indisputably, the most desirable marque to own, but that time has passed. GT racing is on the rise and Ferrari hardly figures.

Meanwhile costs continue to rise. At the time of writing, Manor is in administration. Until the Brazilian GP Manor, having won a point, was looking at a small share of the revenue, a share much less than Ferrari's annual bonus.

No team is bigger than its sport, a rule which applies everywhere except Formula One.

Wholesale changes need to be made and I do not envy the task which Liberty Media has taken on. Formula One is governed by many secret agreements and contracts, and such as the exclusive Strategy Group, so many that there has ceased to be an overall vision.

There is no point in consulting the teams because each has its own agenda of self-interest. Herding cats would be an easier proposition.

What is needed is an overall vision for the sport and I hope that Liberty Media can provide that, and deliver it.

Mike Lawrence.

Learn more about Mike and check out his previous features, here



more features >


galleries >

  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • latest F1/Formula 1 images


or Register for a Pitpass ID to have your say

Please note that all posts are reactively moderated and must adhere to the site's posting rules and etiquette.

Post your comment



1. Posted by Bill Hopgood, 28/01/2017 19:52

"I caught up with a fellow F1 fan over a recent lunch event who I had not discussed the sport with for a long time. He was/is? an avid Ferrari fan while I'm a McLaren Man (just, after the way Ron Denis left) so over the years we've had a bit of banter and usually he has had the bragging rights.
Last year he watched one grand prix and has killed off his SkyNZ sport subscription. He just can't be bothered with F1 any more and he values his time to spend on other things.
I did not get to the nub of the reason why, though it was certainly more than just Ferrari not winning everything from 2000 - 2004.
This got me thinking again as to the "why?" of following and watching F1 for myself and increasingly it is becoming more difficult to justify compared to other forms of motorsport.
Last year was the first in 20 that I've just recorded the GPs and ignored the wireless and watched on a Monday evening. Usually, it is a 5am start to watch them "live" before work, recorded on the Sky device.
MotoGP, GP2, WRC, and GT racing were much more interesting overall for me and unless the first 3 - 4 races prove interesting in F1 this season I'm probably going to take a sabbatical if not fully retire.
Back to the "why".
F1 is way too complicated.
For example, I like the technical nature of the business of F1 however the power units are just too damn complicated to explain to myself let alone anyone else. If I'm struggling to understand what is going on even before the race then how is the casual observer supposed to get on? Try explaining DRS and the reason behind it while someone just watched a MotoGP race with passes galore. I know they are not really comparable but to a newbie they are.
Now try mentioning to a newbie that there favourite team Ferrari (it just about always is) gets a bonus before kick off (I know McLaren do too) while Manor are on their **** while Merc got less money despite winning the year before... Goodbye newbie.
F1 needs to be dramatically simplified and the structure of the championship sorted. English Premier League football is a good example where there is no salary cap yet the sport does very well even though the same five teams win the majority of championships.
My solutions to F1's problems?
Charge the tracks less so there is no need for government funding and punters can actually go and watch while the tracks make money. The broadcast (internet and TV) rights can go to the commercial owner as they do now but the circuits need some trackside revenue and gate takings.
F1 needs to ditch any links to road cars regarding powertrain technology meaning, get rid of the hybrid power unit and leave that to sports cars and formula E. Let there be more variation scope so a V8 can race a V12 or V10 or even rotary engine. Get rid of stupid engine and fuel limits and let the teams and drivers race.
Bring back two more tyre suppliers and also in season testing so the teams can entertain their partners better giving them more value.
Link better with GP2 (thanks GrahamG) and have a Tasman Asia Series with F1 demonstration events between races (off season testing)? Let their be grid and paddock walks as Highlands Motorsport Park has.
Have quali on Saturday, a sprint on Sunday morning, then a slightly shorter race on Sunday afternoon. Attention spans have changed.
Kick the teams off the rules making body. Give them the specs and let them build the cars.
And if Ferrari don't like it... that is fine. No team is bigger than the sport.
Only 5 days to the Bathurst 12 Hour and a ton of cool GT cars to watch!
Sunday morning rant over... sorry it went on a bit.
Thank you Mike Lawrence and for the article and the platform and the other folks for their posts previous to this one.


Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by metalhead, 26/01/2017 2:48

"Dead sport if you can call it that. Nothing but a fringe activity and that is it. It had its time but now people want action quick. People are not wired to sit for 2 hours and watch anything unless its a video game. Sure you will find hard core enthusiasts that will unconditionally support F1, but these are a small segment of the population. Game over"

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by Uffen, 17/01/2017 2:40

"The money issue is straight forward to me. F1 is (should be) a meritocracy. So, each team gets an even share of the "Bernie money." Then, the merit comes to those who perform well and are able to demand more money for the space on their cars. No team can complain with an allocation like that. "

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

4. Posted by Editor, 16/01/2017 10:22

"RE: Finally, while in general terms, no Club or Team is greater than the Sport Arsenal is the exception which proves the rule......."

Hmm... looks like someone could be facing a lifetime ban..."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

5. Posted by GrahamG, 16/01/2017 9:22

"Well thought out, but in the end the money men will follow the money and not much will change. Unfortunately the whole thing is going to have to be allowed to crash before anything useful changes. The current approach is going to result in 4 or 5 teams competing largely in places the fan base doesn't relate to shown only on pay TV with increasingly "trendy" formats. (Does this sound like international cricket to anyone?)
If that makes money (and it might) then that's the future of F1 over the next 3 or 4 years.
However when the manufacturers realise that they have lost the audience and withdraw because there is no kudos to being in F1 the whole thing will cease to be viable (I can't see Ferrari as the latter day Cosworth
supplying virtually everyone with an engine) and the FIA will have to take it back and try to start again.
There is a big opportunity sitting out there - a multi round European GP2 series with winter races in Australia and New Zealand. 2 or 3 rounds in each country, lower technical costs, lower travel costs, decent tyres, a good fan base with proper promotion, free to air TV. Complete divorce from F1, just let it go away and die

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

6. Posted by Spindoctor, 16/01/2017 8:02

"Very nicely put, and coherently argued.
I' share Usedtobe's concerns about what Liberty will actually DO (as opposed to what their SpinDoktors say...).

The Liberty Media saga encapsulates all the problems that F1 has as a "Sport". As Bill Clinton might say: "Its the money, stupid".
The existence of "rights" to F1 which are bought & sold independently of the participating Teams or the FIA necessarily leads to the situation we have today. Sky bought the rights to televise football matches, not the right to promote and manage them. Rupert Murdoch has little or no power over (say) the offside rule, or where Arsenal play their matches, compare & contrast with our own sainted Bernie....

Finally, while in general terms, no Club or Team is greater than the Sport Arsenal is the exception which proves the rule......."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

7. Posted by Usedtobe, 09/01/2017 22:03

"It's well known that the origin of the extra money given to Ferrari was Max Mosleys way of dividing to conquer, and for a while i thought that was unfair. No team is bigger than the sport, true, however, considering the contribution to the sport by Ferraris fan base, by far the larger, be it by tv subscriptions, the races atendance or just the soundbytes over F1, perhaps that extra money is justified. Don't know how things unfold in Britain, but in my country football clubs are payed according to their fan base. As or Liberty Media i couldn't agree more. the issue is that the acquisition was made whith money they didn' had, therefore the cash cows are needed, and after you get used to something... I don't share Mr. Lawrence faith in Liberty, let's hope i'm wrong."

Rating: Negative (-4)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

8. Posted by Editor, 09/01/2017 15:16

"@ vins0n

No need to be so ridiculously obtuse.

You know EXACTLY what Mike was getting at.


Rating: Positive (2)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

9. Posted by vins0n, 09/01/2017 15:05

"I'm not sure the native tribes would agree that there's no ancient history in America."

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Share this page


Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2021. All rights reserved.

about us  |  advertise  |  contact  |  privacy & security  |  rss  |  terms