Site logo

Force India administrators facing legal action

NEWS STORY
27/09/2018

As expected, Russian potash fertilizer producer and exporter, Uralkali, of which Dmitry Mazepin is a non-executive director, is taking legal action against the administrators of the Force India F1 team.

The Russian company warned of legal action last month when it questioned the process by which a consortium led by Lawrence Stroll bought the Silverstone-based outfit, suggesting that the process "may not be in the best interests of Force India creditors and stakeholders, and the sport in general".

In a new statement, which once again does not mention Mazepin, the Russian company confirms that it has begun proceedings in the London High Court and is seeking substantial damages for "prejudicial and unequal treatment".

"The Company sells its fertilizers to more than 60 countries worldwide, including 20 in which Formula One holds its Grand Prix Championship," it reads.

"For several years, Uralkali, together with one of its subsidiaries, has been a partner of Force India and one of the sponsors of the Russian Formula One Grand Prix in Sochi. Force India would be a highly effective and valuable marketing tool for the business."

Uralkali claims that the winning bid was lower than its bid, while describing the response from the administrators as "inadequate".

Its "extremely generous offer", included a cash consideration of between £101.5m and £122m, would have paid more than £40m to Force India's holding company.

"We had a strong business case for acquiring Force India and we believe our bid was the best one tabled," said Paul Ostling, an independent director of Uralkali. "We have serious concerns as to why the Administrators did not use the opportunity to maximise the amounts that could have been paid to creditors and shareholders."

Uralkali's case may well be aided by an FIA press release issued in the wake of the sale to Stroll's consortium which declared that "since the Force India Formula One Team Limited was placed into administration on 27 July, the FIA has worked in collaboration with the Joint Administrators (Geoff Rowley and Jason Baker of FRP Advisory LLP), Racing Point UK Limited and Formula One Management to ensure the expedient and compliant transition of the team's assets to the new entrant".

In other words, according to the FIA's own press release, from the day that Force India went into administration, the aim was for Racing Point to be the new F1 entrant.

Check out our Thursday gallery from Sochi, here.

LATEST NEWS

more news >

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images

POST A COMMENT

or Register for a Pitpass ID to have your say

Please note that all posts are reactively moderated and must adhere to the site's posting rules and etiquette.

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

 

1. Posted by Tombstone, 27/09/2018 15:24

"A fertilizer manufacturer be better off sponsoring Williams, they're now a sh*t team so there's a lot of synergy."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by bfairey, 27/09/2018 12:03

"Come on Editor remove that stupid rant by Ted Baker."

Rating: Positive (2)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by Ted Baker, 27/09/2018 10:50

"Not sure F1 should be promoting a company that produces products that can be harmful to the environment such as Potash.
Nutrient pollution has impacted many streams, rivers, lakes, bays and coastal waters for the past several decades, resulting in serious environmental and human health issues, and impacting the economy. Too much nitrogen and phosphorus in the water causes algae to grow faster than ecosystems can handle.

Also As with all mining activities, the extraction and bene- ficiation of phosphate rock and potash to produce mineral fertilizer raw material has the potential to cause environmental impacts. These impacts can take the form of changes to the landscape, water contami- nation, excessive water consumption and air pollution.

As the FIA is looking for a greener future for the sport I think it is essential to look at all owners and sponsors in terms of not only how the sport can change but also to only include companies that are supporting the same long term vision for the environment.

It`s probably in the sports best interests to keep companies that have potential environmental issues away from the sport."

Rating: Negative (-1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Share this page

X

Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2021. All rights reserved.

about us  |  advertise  |  contact  |  privacy & security  |  rss  |  terms

Motorsport Memorabilia Footer