Site logo

Lloyds still has 10m loan with Marussia

NEWS STORY
21/10/2013

Earlier this month it came to light that Marussia had taken the title of making the biggest loss of any team in Formula One history. The previous holder of this dubious honour was Lotus as Pitpass' business editor Christian Sylt revealed in May, but Marussia left it for dust with a net loss for 2012 of 59m. The news appeared in a UK paper on the very same day that its financial statements became available which seems unusual as it could raise the question of whether the team itself gave a tip off with the bad news. If that is what happened it would be strange even by Formula One standards.

The general rule of thumb is to keep quiet about bad news. Doing the opposite simply increases the coverage of it because the outlet which is tipped off would perhaps not have otherwise written about it and others will do so anyway. There are only a few occasions when this has happened in F1's history and they aren't highlights to remember.

Back in 2011 Silverstone's owner the BRDC issued a press release stating that it had moved from a 1.3m profit in 2009 to a 1.9m loss in 2010. It followed an equally strange incident when Williams' former chairman Adam Parr tipped off a media outlet that the team's upcoming accounts would show a 13.8% fall in revenue with profit more than halving.

As Pitpass wrote at the time, it is extremely useful to journalists like Sylt when the boss of a company gives a public tip-off indicating that its annual accounts will soon be filed. It allows multiple newspaper articles to be written - one about the tip-off and another about the meat of the accounts when they are filed. In turn this gives time to think over the details in the documents which brings us back to Marussia

In April Sylt revealed that Lloyds Development Capital (LDC), the private equity division of taxpayer-owned Lloyds bank, had sold its shares in the team to Marussia, the Russian sports car manufacturer which the outfit is named after. LDC invested an estimated 10m in Marussia in 2009 and held a 25.3% stake. Despite the team never scoring a point since joining F1 in 2009 LDC confirmed that the sale enabled it "to recoup the full value of its investment in the business."

Accounts for the team's parent company Manor HoldCo show that in the year to 31 December 2012 borrowings increased by 33m. However, that's not the end of the story. An article by Sylt in today's Daily Telegraph reveals that although LDC only provided a small portion of the debt incurred last year, the bank confirmed that it has a residual loan with the team which is believed to be around 10m.

The debt was needed to keep the team ticking over in 2012 as it burned up the record loss which widened by 27.4% on the previous year. It was driven by an 8.7% increase in costs to 76.1m whilst revenue only rose by 2.9% to 29.4m.

Staff numbers increased by 58 with the majority of the increase in production and engineering. Nevertheless, it still left the team with 46 people in management and administration out of a total 168.

It is no secret that there is a vast gulf in budgets between the top and bottom of the grid. In April Sylt revealed that Ferrari's F1 contract entitles it to a minimum amount of guaranteed annual prize money which comes to more than double Marussia's revenue.

F1's smaller teams often say that they face difficult times due to F1's soaring costs. Indeed, in May Marussia's sporting director Graeme Lowdon said that "if there are sharp fluctuations in revenues and increasing costs then it is a recipe for serious trouble. It should be attractive for all the players in the industry, not a few." That may well be true but it is perhaps not the only factor at work. GP3 does not have the same fluctuations in revenues and increasing costs which are hallmarks of F1 but Marussia's accounts show that its team in that series made a 178,000 net loss in 2012 on revenue of 1.2m.

Marussia F1's chief executive Andy Webb says that the F1 marketplace "continues to exhibit some volatility in terms of sponsorship income which has come under pressure from the condition of the global economy."

In the 2011 accounts Webb revealed that he was in "active discussions with potential new investors in the business" and in the latest filing he says there are still "on-going discussions with a number of interested parties." The 2011 documents also stated that Marussia has an objective of a podium finish in the inaugural Russian Grand Prix next year. Perhaps unsurprisingly, this bold aim is noticeably absent from the latest documents.

LATEST NEWS

more news >

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images

POST A COMMENT

or Register for a Pitpass ID to have your say

Please note that all posts are reactively moderated and must adhere to the site's posting rules and etiquette.

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

 

1. Posted by steve brown, 31/10/2014 12:28 (moderated by an Adminstrator, 31/10/2014 12:32)

"This comment was removed by an administrator as it was judged to have broken the site's posting rules and etiquette."

Rating: Neutral (0)

2. Posted by steve brown, 30/10/2014 17:05 (moderated by an Adminstrator, 30/10/2014 17:33)

"This comment was removed by an administrator as it was judged to have broken the site's posting rules and etiquette."

Rating: Neutral (0)

3. Posted by GoodPublicity, 15/11/2013 23:22

"A significant factor underlying the lack of well-funded teams over the years is F1's inadequate marketing value for the vast majority of major car makers and tyre makers.

These companies have the financial resources to underwrite the development and supply of two of the sport's most expensive 'consumables', but only a handful of them have been involved in F1 at any one time.

Formula 1 will continue to struggle for numbers until it attracts more of those key players, but with the kingpin in his dotage don't hold your breath waiting for anything to change under the current regime."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Share this page

X

Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2019. All rights reserved.

about us  |  advertise  |  contact  |  privacy & security  |  rss  |  terms