Site logo

Mercedes blocking unfreeze moves

NEWS STORY
12/10/2014

Mercedes looks unlikely to change its opposition to the engine unfreeze any time soon, and its rivals are not happy.

Under the current rules, in an attempt to limit spending, a certain amount of engine development can be carried out each year, manufacturers are allowed to change up to 48% of 45 components. However, these changes are only allowed once the season has ended and from 2015 will be scaled back further.

The 2014 units were homologated on February 28 and since then changes have only been allowed for reasons of safety, reliability or to cut costs.

Whilst Mercedes has enjoyed clear superiority, rivals Renault and Ferrari have struggled, and consequently are pushing for an unfreeze, allowing performance development in-season, and naturally the German manufacturer isn't happy.

Having initially agreed to the move, Mercedes is now against it and at a meeting of the Strategy Group in Sochi, it, Williams and Lotus, which will use the German manufacturer's units next season voted against the move.

For the move to be implemented, it will require the unanimous agreement from the F1 Commission and if Mercedes maintains its stance it would mean it could not be put before the FIA's world Motor Sport Council.

In the latest case of self-interest before all else to hit the sport, Christian Horner revealed his frustration, though one wonders how he might feel if the boot was on the other foot and Renault was the dominant power unit.

"In Singapore the teams unanimously agreed on a position and then, I think, subsequently from that meeting, Mercedes changed their position," he revealed at the Friday press conference. "We've subsequently had a strategy meeting and it's been voted on a majority basis for that to go through to the Formula One Commission for in-season upgrades to be allowed.

"We'll see what the outcome of the Formula Commission vote is," he added. "FIA are in support, FOM are in support. Obviously the non-Mercedes teams are in support - so we'll see what that holds in approximately a month's time."

"Thinking of frozen engines... this is not Formula One," added Marco Mattiacci. "So I agree with Christian, today we have the majority of the votes to move ahead on the idea to unfreeze the engine. Let's see what's going to happen during the F1 Commission."

Speaking later, Wolff dismissed claims that Mercedes position is about dominance and more about installing some form of stability in the sport, that and a means of controlling spending.

"We already voted against it in the Strategy Group and I don't think we will change our mind in the next month or whenever the meeting will take place," he said. "We have rules and we have governance, and the governance is in place in order to avoid quick, knee-jerk decisions being made that upset stability, upset the commercial setup and I strongly believe you cannot change rules in October for the following year just because you think they don't suit you.

"Because there is a governing process in place, the F1 Commission needs to vote on that anyway," he continued. And if the F1 Commission is not unanimous in that particular case for next year then that is absolutely right because you cannot vote for stuff three months before the new season starts. In no business does this go on. So, for 2016 we are going through an ordinary process, we are going to have a look at it again and then decide whether it is the right thing to do.

"We've looked at it because we wanted to take up the challenge and say 'OK, somebody wants to do in-season development, what's the in-season development? Let's take the challenge up'. But what does it mean as a consequence for the series itself? What does it mean commercially? How much does it cost? I think as a serious business you have to explore these costs and not just say 'why don't we do it?' So we need to explore those costs and also you need to look at what it means logistically."

In terms of costs, he added. "We are a team with three customers, including ourselves four customers, so whatever we do we need to be able to develop a power unit and deliver a power unit that is the same for everybody. It's different to Honda which has one customer only, it's different to Ferrari that has two customers and we don't know next year, and different for Renault again. All these things need careful evaluation, needs thorough analysis and assessment and then we can take a decision."

LATEST NEWS

more news >

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images

POST A COMMENT

or Register for a Pitpass ID to have your say

Please note that all posts are reactively moderated and must adhere to the site's posting rules and etiquette.

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

 

1. Posted by ratchet69, 19/10/2014 9:49

"There is always a danger that, if the Honda power unit is on the pace from the start, Ferrari will have the slowest of the four available power units. If Ferrari cannot get the unfreeze move approved, even with the assistance of the 'Ferrari International Assistance', they could be stuck firmly in the midfield.
Ferrari-Honda in 2016 anyone?"

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by Podge, 18/10/2014 15:12

"And what will happen when Mercedes is able to throw vast sums of money into developing an already first-class engine? It'll get stronger. It'll get more reliable. It'll get more efficient. Then Horner and whoever is in charge of Ferrari this week will want another freeze."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by my tyres are going off, 16/10/2014 15:56

"One engine is always better than the next for various reasons not just power. When Red Bull dropped Ferrari power for Reanult because it allowed them to build a more aerodynamic car I did not hear Renault or Red Bull calling for it's competitors to be allowed a complete redesign. So two of the three engine manufactures dropped the ball with the new regs and want to spend money upgrading. Problem is Merc wil respond and put up the price of engine units. Williams will be asked to pay more for choosing the right engine last year.

So having said all that why do I think the freeze should be thawed? Because of the Honda loophole, build a new engine and you are not covered by this years freeze and you now know what you are targetting. This allows a major team (say Red Bull) to to go to Peugot to build it a new engine. Now cynics might say that this engine will be an upgraded and rebadged Renault but that is the situation.

My solution is that Renault and Ferrari should have to pay a fine that compenasates the current Merc clients for any extra costs unfreezing imposes on them and not be allowed to raise prices to current underpowered customers."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

4. Posted by F One, 15/10/2014 21:46

"Disgusting of them."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

5. Posted by Spindoctor, 14/10/2014 20:10

"Seems a tad unsporting of Mercedes. Though that would be predicated on the notion that formula One is a Sport."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Share this page

X

Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2022. All rights reserved.

about us  |  advertise  |  contact  |  privacy & security  |  rss  |  terms