Headlines

FIA refuses return to 2012 spec rubber
Words with Whitmarsh
How the times can change
Ecclestone ready to buy New Jersey race promoter to get race off the ground
Lowe joins Mercedes next month
Teamwear finally in stock
Ecclestone: Marussia would be better off with a McLaren or a Williams chassis
Ecclestone tips BMW for F1 return
Monaco GP: Preview - Pirelli
Monaco GP: Preview - Force India

Related links

Date Title
29/06 Spanish motor sport boss backs Mosley, sort of
28/06 Mosley, pulling out all the stops
28/06 Mosley continues his assault on teams alliance
27/06 Teams uneasy with Donnelly's 'relationship' with Manor
26/06 Mosley writes to FIA member clubs
26/06 Transcript of FOTA Press Conference
25/06 Mosley ready to do a U-Turn?
25/06 FOTA seeking to entertain its customers, the fans
25/06 So what's next
24/06 Luca di Montezemolo thanks the fans

How neutral was the 2010 team selection process?

03/07/2009

The F1 world was stunned when Manor, Campos and USF1 were recently revealed to be the three new teams which would join the F1 grid next year. However, according to the Guardian, one man in the FIA seemed to have a good idea as to the identity of one of those teams several weeks before its selection was announced.

Alan Donnelly, the official representative of FIA president Max Mosley, has already been criticised for his consultancy firm, Sovereign Strategy, allegedly doing public relations work for the Manor team. However, if true, this conflict of interest would be nothing compared to what has come to light today.

The Guardian reports that on 29 May, two weeks before the FIA announced the identity of the three successful bidders for a place on the 2010 grid, Donnelly sent a sponsorship and investment agreement about Manor to a certain 'Royal Highness' who he hoped to meet in Saudi Arabia.

The email (complete with spelling mistakes), which is allegedly from Donnelly, says "I attach both the investment and sponsorship agreement for your consideration. Virgin have signed to be investment partners with a share holding of around 20%. I will be in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia on Saturday evening and look forward to seeing you at our planned meeting at 3pm on Sunday, with representatives of Manor and Virgin. However if you woud like a pre- meeting with me privately on Sunday then please let me know, I will ofcourse be available."

If Donnelly really was touting around investment opportunities in the team before it got to the grid it raises huge conflict of interest issues.

By selling stakes in Manor, Donnelly would have been helping the team get investment which thereby improved its financial position. Clearly, no one connected to the FIA should have been favouring any prospective teams and particularly one which also has the involvement of Nick Wirth, who was one of Max Mosley's business partners in the 1990s before he launched the Simtek F1 team.

Furthermore, one has to wonder whether Donnelly would have bothered brokering deals for a team which didn't get to the grid. Then again, how could Donnelly possibly have known that it would?

According to the Guardian, Donnelly was in Saudi Arabia on official FIA business, holding meetings with its sports ministry, potential investors in new circuits and the Saudi Motorsport Federation. "I also met potential investors in Formula One," he said. "It would be odd for an FIA representative to refuse to assist in any of these projects."

That may be so but there is a big difference between assisting with a team and brokering the sale of a stake in it.

If Donnelly's response in the Guardian is anything to go by, it doesn't look as if he is denying that the email really was from him which in itself seems to raise a further question about his competence.

The email is signed off 'God Bless' which certainly does not seem to be an appropriate way to address anyone in the Arab world. After last year's revelations about Mosley's private life, the FIA surely doesn't need more embarrassment heaped on it by blunders like this.

Page: 1 | 2 | Next | Last

Search

Search the PITPASS news
 
 

Widgets

Printer friendly page
Send to a friend
Discuss on the forum
Post to Facebook
Post to Twitter
RSS Feed
     

  Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2013. All rights reserved.

About | Advertise | Contact  | Copyright | Privacy & Security | RSS