Site logo

The Power of One

FEATURE BY MAX NOBLE
06/02/2019

One is a lovely number.

The French, long may the Lord bless their cheese, claret, and penchant for riots, loved it so much they created a metricated system where finding the telephone number of Miss Physics was far, far simpler than the utterly confusing mess that was the old Imperial system of weights and measures. One gram transmutes with ease into one kilo and onward and upward to the tonne. Similarly, as the units get more complex so the cross-conversions have a simplicity psychosis that keeps Miss Physics all at one with herself.

The joy of creation mapped in maths, so sweet and simple Mother Nature herself could hug it.

So why, oh why therefore is it that business human after business human confounds the "One" with the word "Formula" and hears it in their head as "Formula to make One Money!"?

Haas are the latest in a long line of fine folk, to an extent including Colin Chapman and certainly including the delightfully eccentric Paul Stoddart, to see Formula One, to read the press (indeed including the manic musings from these storied pages so professionally edited by the esteemed editor Balfe), to see the leviathans of the freeways backing fresh cash up to Bernie's back door and still somehow conclude that running a Formula One team is not only reasonably simple, but cheap and profitable!!

Lord, they cannot all be on the same vegan tea Eddie Jordan, surely?!

Time after time we see them bound into the sport shouting "Formula to make One Money", only to see them, post a Bernie frisk 'n' shakedown, stagger blinking, broke and confused back into the daylight a few years later silently mouthing... "What the F1 just happened to me?" As if this outcome was ever in any doubt or unknowable in advance.

It's enough to make the humble fan turn to politics for sanity and direction...!

Off-shore yacht racing, or the America's Cup, or indeed Australia's very own Sydney to Hobart yacht race are all aquatic wallet racing. Pure and simple.

Commission the design and build of a world class racing yacht to the "Maxi-Class" or "Super-Maxi Class". Ensure every single leading edge refinement is included with no expense spared. Spend a fortune on Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) modelling (a la F1 practice). Spend more on "Single Use Nano-fibre" racing masts (which weigh nothing and are good for several hours of continuous use...). Then buy sails made of hand woven unobtainium that make Gossamer Albatross look bloated. And top off with the world's best crew... that come at the world's top price...

...and the guys in the Big Boy Pants... they know this. Yes they do...

Alan Bond, long may his memory fail him, kicked if all off for the modern era by financing the Winged Keel America's Cup yacht (Australia Two). But any cursory amble back through the pages of history will see that the "America's Cup" was pure, simple, totally understood, Aquatic Wallet Racing from day one.

The Americans knew that. Those dear, sweet, tweed-wrapped English chaps just took a little longer to catch on. Not Bond. He plundered big. Lived big. Spent big. And as a result won big. Score one for the colonials, winning a trophy off, well, the other colonials.

Yah Boo Sucks to you Green and Pleasant Land (of losers...).

So, to return not unlike a rabid rat to Warfarin, why in the name of all that is purchasable do men of some intellect and some wallet thickness hold on to the belief that F1 is cheap, and profitable?

Dear Lord, it's like going to a Taylor Swift concert and expecting a fifteen minute Slash guitar solo and drum risers flying over the crowd... I mean really...

Or expecting a tear-jerking Miles Davis cover at a One Direction Concert... Big tip fans... Neither is going to happen!

So dear grown men of some means and - judged on performance to date - limited intellectual ability for assessing the world outside your own orbits. In simple words. I'll resist using capitals, hoping you can work with lower case (It's an Internet shouty thing...).

Formula One is a Massive Wallet Racing (that's money) exercise.

My genius plus $300m beats your genius with $247m.

You double to $494m? Cool I'll double to $600m as I so LOVE winning. (Sorry capitals, my bad).

Just look at the non-zero, non-one figures...

Mercedes is worth around $65bn.

Aston is worth in the region of $6.4bn, one tenth of the value of Mercedes, but still a big number.

Haas is privately held, but is estimated to have made Gene Haas around $750m. So while not to be sneezed at, if he was pumping a few hundred million extra through his team to keep it going, you can see where he would be "Doing a Stoddart" in the not too distant future.

If Lance Stroll's dad dropped every penny of his reported net worth of $2.7bn on F1 and motoring he'd still only be 4.15% of the value of Mercedes. The Big Boys in the designer Big Boy Pants really are big, no matter how you measure them.

Paul Stoddart was worth "a fair bit" and it was too much for him. Mr King Fisher himself, V.J. All OK Mallya, was, depending on whom one asks, worth, or at least had access to (regardless of precise details on ownership) a fair bit.

Richard, million-dollar-smile, Branson ran Virgin Racing for around thirty-five minutes before, rightly, concluding the figure required to win was way... way... way... more than it was worth to him. Consequently, he took his money and ran... And there, via that exit door, goes a smart man.

Enzo knew what it took to win. His fight with Ford about not selling out forced the American giant to design and build the original GT40 at excessive expense. That was wallet and ego racing writ large. You simply do not get that level of passion and near-insane commitment these days.

Recall, Enzo only sold (irksome) road cars to fund his racing obsession. The. Man. Was. Obsessed.

Love it or hate it, heck you had to respect it. One Man, One Mission.

So dearest of readers (for you are still reading...) we have the pure passion that is Ferrari today. One great Italian team. We have Mercedes, the one colossus left from the pre-war years of Auto Union and auto racing being the cutting edge for human engineering. We have Red Bull, the one crazy extreme sports, cost no object, company on the planet (seriously guys, without them and Christian ‘The Yokes on Me' Horner where would the giggles in F1 be these days?). We then have One mighty dust-up in the mid-field, and One mighty let down in McLaren.

Do you see the Power of One in all this?

Each One of us is a fan. Each One of us is the Master of being One's Self. Each team is struggling in a world of One simply to beat themselves from last year.

Formula One. One is Fun (sorry 1980s Delia Smith cook book, how did that get in here...?). One day we will win...

One day we will, I promise, look back on this decade as one of the golden ones of years gone by... Each day is special. Each team struggles mightily to perform. But most importantly each person is special. Each engineer, marketer, designer and driver in F1 is driven and they share One passion; to race, and in living that One passion they know what winning demands of them.

...and the One thing rich men who have come to believe their own press releases fail to grasp time after time is that the One thing One needs to race in F1 is One giant mother of a wallet.

RELATED ARTICLES

LATEST FEATURES

more features >

LATEST IMAGES

galleries >

  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images
  • Pitpass.com latest F1/Formula 1 images

POST A COMMENT

or Register for a Pitpass ID to have your say

Please note that all posts are reactively moderated and must adhere to the site's posting rules and etiquette.

Post your comment

READERS COMMENTS

 

1. Posted by mickl, 19/02/2019 15:53

"Simple wings, ground effect floor, manual gear box and no power steering. "

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

2. Posted by Max Noble, 13/02/2019 0:52

"@ClarkwasGod - we can dream of regulations that non-prescriptive... sigh!
Yes the original Spa was my intention for the time period. We call our local speed control “artifices” Senna Chicanes Which is a great way to remember a great man via a tragic concept each time one does a left-right-left flick in local bumper to bumper traffic...

Wasn’t that a charity match for Welsh mental health week ;-). "

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

3. Posted by ClarkwasGod, 12/02/2019 15:06

"@ Max - Monaco - run it as an F/Libre and maybe give a M6 or M7 to Pedro and Seppi (or Stefan Bellof) to lock out the front row, then would be difficult if not impossible for any cars F1 or otherwise to overtake in the race - remember Villeneuve at Jarama with the entire field up his pipes? Spa - the original iteration, I assume you mean - where I will be driving down the Masta straight (kink), early May (read and weep!!!).

I also forgot to remind you about the rugby on 10th November last year in Cardiff...how very remiss of me!!! ;-)"

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

4. Posted by Max Noble, 12/02/2019 2:46

"@ClarkwasGod - a timely reminder that those who forget history are doomed to repeat it :-)
A very good point. The F1 cars of the time (before they became packages...) were leading edge light weight open wheelers... and the 917 is a beast. My feeling is the 1960s F1 cars would win around Monaco, while the Can-Am cars and 917 would win at Monza. Spa and Silverstone would be very excitingly balanced!

So a very good point that this obsession with “Big, best, pinnacle of Motorsport” didn’t really exist back then... and it worked just fine for everyone. Liberty seem intent on making F1 a niche sport once more so it will all be good in a couple of seasons...!"

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

5. Posted by ClarkwasGod, 11/02/2019 18:21

"@Max, and Canuck - back in the late 60's, Group 7 Can-Am cars were faster than F1 - as were the 917 monsters of a few years later - but it never seemed to be a problem. F1 was F1. As much as anything, you KNEW that the very best drivers were there, and the cars were cutting edge technology even if they were not the absolutely fastest car around. Jim Hall had no problems with movable aerodynamics (just a shame he persisted with the automatic transmission) - and the current WEC cars don't seem to have too much problem racing in close proximity, their downforce (ground-effect being less affected than front/rear wings). But sadly the FIA seem obsessed with excessive and stifling rules for their own sake, whatever "reason" they might give - mind you, if they did loosen the reins a little (or a lot), and managed to end up with really spectacular cars that sold themselves, the various marketing spin-doctors might find themselves under(or un)-employed as being surplus to requirements!"

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

6. Posted by Max Noble, 10/02/2019 23:15

"@Spindoctor - quite...! Formula E is more relatable to current road cars. Even something as simple as the moveable rear wing on many Porsches (the real ones not the SUVs) is banned in F1 as they are not allowed moveable Aero. Surely moveable Aero is a key component to resolving the “I cannot follow the car in front” problem...? Adjust the Aero manually as you get closer... sigh..."

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

7. Posted by Max Noble, 10/02/2019 23:11

"@Canuck - well reasoned suggestions. My feeling has always been that the tension between lawyers and engineers has resulted in us having the prescriptive rules we do. The lawyers do not fully grasp how to respectfully dance with Miss Physics, and the engineers do not fully grasp how to speak in a manner “others” can understand... step forward and take a bow for irritating compromise... FIA...! "

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

8. Posted by Canuck, 10/02/2019 15:01

"@Max Noble - Thanks for your well thought out reply. I was not advocating a freeze of development, as I love the technology behind the new cars. I just wish there was more emphasis on the mechanical and less on the aero side. We are not in the Red Bull flying race aces but on drivers of race cars. What if one of the rules limited the steering wheel to only a horn button and not 3000 ways of changing parameters while driving down a straight at 300+ KM. What about cameras for rear view mirrors?
There should be more freedom in power units - only limited by displacement and fuel consumption. There should more freedon on the whole mechanical side and more restriction on the aero side. What about minimum Coefficient of drag? These are not backward steps but forward steps."

Rating: Negative (-1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

9. Posted by Spindoctor, 10/02/2019 14:02

"@maxNobele
Being a naive and simple fellow I had always assumed that FOM "owns" the right to sell F1, but that FIA sets the rules, as you (MN) indicate at the end of your reply!

I'm sure there are brilliant "Gamekeeper turned Poacher"-type analogies which fit today's 'confused' situation in which FOM seems simply to run the whole shebang, without recourse to anyone, least of all FIA.
Whatever solution is adopted to 'fix' F1 two facts will remain:
1. It costs a shedload of money to run a team,
2. you can't swim in the same river twice.

I think that ultimately Liberty's biggest problem is Formula E. It has already snaffled all those luvverly city tracks, and involves technologies which quite recognisably are in cars like my Leaf. Batteries, electric motor, control gubbins are all there, just more & better! This is exactly where F1 was when I were a Lad. Jim, Clark's Lotus was essentially just a more sophisticated, lighter, smaller version of my Dad's Sunbeam Talbot. F1 can never go back to that halcyon era, attempting to do so will just be trying to swim upstream against the tide of History....

I've now sampled a good few Formula E races, and they're quite good fun. They're not F1, and now that F1 is behind a Paywall in UK I'll miss it.
"

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

10. Posted by Max Noble, 10/02/2019 2:55

"@Canuck - ok, ready now :-). ...yes fully agree the mix and match between FOM and the FIA has me robustly confused. I can imagine FOM wanting a say on what the FIA seems to be the offical rules, but the entire Ross Brawn Skunk Works concept seems strange. Why not one by BMW, Toyota, Mercedes...? For, as you rightly highlight, the FIA is the rule setting governing body...

...as to the R&D arms race costing a fortune... well like yacht racing... as soon as the technology can be a major influencing factor people will try to outspend one another to gain advantage.
The world of cycling resorted to pushing the clock back, more or less, to the 1980s when it came to bike technology for the hour record. Now called the “Atheletes Hour Record” as the bike used has to be built to a fairly simple specification, broadly similar to that used by Eddy Merckx when he set the hour record in 1972 in Mexico (49.431Km in one hour of cycling...!) stood for 12 years. Then the Lotus bikes, the flying Scotsman (Graeme Obree), then Chris Boardman on the Lotus 110 achieved 56.375Km in an hour in 1996... and the UCI cried “Enough already!” And pushed the technology back to more or less what Merckx used.

Is that a level playing field, money saving, or killing of brilliance? Whichever, in the world of cycling it leaves more money spare for all those asthma inhalers...

So do we freeze F1 technology in, say, 1989 but with modern safety features? The problem being that a 2025 Lancer Evo, or WRX STi will lap Melbourne faster than one of these dinosaurs. Can you imagine if the celebrity race had a lower lap time than the main event!?

... so! FIA should be front and centre setting logical rules and enforcing them.
FOM should be promoting the sport and increasing its fan base.
And we are victims of our own success as progress must not be stopped, but at least contained in some manner so that teams can all be in with a modest chance of a race win each season.


"

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

11. Posted by Max Noble, 09/02/2019 12:02

"@Canuck - ok... on hold music of your choice... and I’ll reflect and reply tomorrow (Aussie time) :-). "

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

12. Posted by Canuck, 09/02/2019 11:57

"@Max Noble - FOM should have a responsibility to ensure that teams are provided enough revenue from the sharing agreement which they seem to be attempting to do. But to me the biggest responsibility to cost increases is not only the teams in spending to be competitive but to also the FIA. The work that Ross and team are doing should not be the responsibility of FOM but that of the FIA. They are the ones that make the rules. And with those rules comes the cost of research and development that the team undertake. "

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

13. Posted by Uffen, 09/02/2019 2:23

"F1 has always been about money. But with the advent of, let's call it Bernie money, the have nots and the haves are pretty well locked in. Yes, Williams could come back and Sauber (now Alfa Romeo) could top the bill but would that change Ferrari's position? Not the way things are now.
It would take M-B walking away (as they have in the past) to shake things up. Canuck had that angle right."

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

14. Posted by Max Noble, 09/02/2019 1:05

"@Canuck, and @NS Biker - yes, very fair observations. My view is that the franchise system in US NFL or the money sharing options for the UK EPL allow successful teams to run on modest profits. After the franchise is purchased the biggest cost is the salary of star players. Soccer transfer fees are only on the scale of galactic star systems because the clubs have the revenue to spend that much.

In F1 the spending *never* stops. It is a research and development race every single season. I’ve written elsewhere on the near-impossible task of policing any cap, so even if introduced, and especially considering that salaries, marketing, and other items are to be excluded (!), it would still not help the small teams.

I’ve a feeling this is going to be One exciting season! Oh! And the races might be exciting too! :-) "

Rating: Neutral (0)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

15. Posted by Canuck, 08/02/2019 15:00

"The biggest difference between F1 and other major league sports, is that once a team is purchased, apart from F1, the owners do have a chance to get a return on their investments in the sport. Only football (soccer) anf F1 have a global presence. Red Bull, Mercedes, Renault, Ferrari (and Alfa Romeo), and Haas are all global players using F! as advertising for their products. I do believe that F1 is the only Ferrari advertising tool. Haas is using F1 to promote their product on a global scale. Unfortunately with F1 there is little chance of getting a return on your investment as the only two (1+1) that can make money are FOM and FIA. Promoters and owners can only really get return on their investments if the can sell enough advertising space on the cars and team wear. And remember under this formula owners come and go. BMW, Toyota, Mercedes, Honda have come and gone when the advertising value has run its course. Some have returned when they see value in their advertising needing a boost (Mercedes, Renault, Honda). But don't count on then in the long term."

Rating: Positive (1)     Rate comment: Positive | NegativeReport this comment

Share this page

X

Copyright © Pitpass 2002 - 2024. All rights reserved.

about us  |  advertise  |  contact  |  privacy & security  |  rss  |  terms